Inspiration for the style was characterized by organic,
flowing lines- forms resembling the stems and blossoms of plants - as well as
geometric forms such as squares and rectangles. This unity of flowing, natural
forms with sharper lines made for the fashioning of Art Nouveau’s elegant
designs. The key elements which composed and differed this style are the Floral
and bulbous designs and “whiplash” curves – (forms resembling the stems and blossoms
of plants - as well as geometric forms such as squares and rectangles).
Quote: Hermann
Obrist's wall-hanging Cyclamen (1894) described it as "sudden violent
curves generated by the crack of a whip," (Yamauchi, 2011)
The Vienna Secession
The word Secession essentially means the unity of a group of
individual professionals who get together to give each other more power to
change, improve or divert from current situations. In Art Nouveau this was very
wide spread and popularised as it was a collective of visual artists, sculptors,
architects, designers, decorators, jewellery makers, specialised craftsmen who
first combined together in 1897 to
promote their work and organise exhibitions.
One of the most resourceful and prominent secessionist was the painter
Gustav Klimt, who was one who tapped into early modernism with rhythmical abstractions
and elaborate gold and silver leaf decorations in his paintings. Two very popular works at Hope II and The Kiss
(both 1907-08).
Klimt's paintings could very well embody what the movement
was not about and perhaps how it also came to its demise. Art Nouveau's
influence is evident in Hope II and similar works, but so is the over
elaboration that, to many critics, this seemed like a betrayal of the
movement's original yearning to match a work's forms to its function.
As the Art
Developed
The movements geographical reach and influence on various
types of media was second to none. However, despite its popularity it enjoyed
very few moments in which all artistic elements came together as a coherent
whole. This celebration can be most
vivid and claimed as comprehensive during the Paris Expo 1900.
The nearer towards the end of the first decade of the 20th
century, the more its popularity started to be abandoned. In spite of its doctrine as mentioned previously of “form
should follow function” which was central to its ethos, some designers began to
break the code and tended to over elaborate its use of decoration. (as seen
before with for example with Gustav Klimt). As the style mature any artists began
to revert back to the very old habits it had initial scorned. Ultimately, it had practically reverted back
to swapping the old for the superficially new. This lead to the style going out of fashion
and making way to the birth of Art Deco in the 1920’s.
A bit about Alfons Mucha:
“Mucha
set the flora motifs moving away for cheret and Toulouse more subtle representations. His dominant theme was
a central female figure surrounded by stylized forms derived from plants and flowers,
Moravian folk art, Byzantine mosaics, and even magic and the occult. Exotic and
sensuous while retaining an aura of innocence,they
express no specific age, nationality, or historical period. His stylized hair
patterns became a hallmark of the era in spite of detractors who dismissed
this aspect of his
work as “noodles and spaghetti.”–
The further development of
French art nouveau pg.213 (Meggs & Purvis, 2012)
Bibliography
Meggs, P. B. & Purvis,
A. W., 2012. Meggs’ History of Graphic Design. Fifth ed. Hoboken, New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Yamauchi, S., 2011. Art Nouveau Style. [Online]
Available at: http://cefiro.main.jp/Art_Nouveau_Style.html
[Accessed 15 January 2015].
Available at: http://cefiro.main.jp/Art_Nouveau_Style.html
[Accessed 15 January 2015].
No comments:
Post a Comment